Latest Comments

  1. Thanks. And thanks also for the collection of graphics depicting the various options that have been considered over the years.…

  2. Greenwelly – have a look at the new post and see if you can still get a train through there.

  3. Jesse – just for you, there is a new post up, that you might like. All about the options.

  4. Well, yes, you’re correct, but it is not just the Japanese doing better than us at Infrastructure. There is some…

  5. I think we need to Hire the the Japanese now. They know how to do Infrastructure better than our own…

  6. I loathed the old Petone-Grenada proposal, but I really like this new proposal. Whereas the old proposal favoured a deep…

  7. Goodness me. Chris Calvi Freeman pulls no punches. https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/360891378/transport-planner-gives-nzta-wellington-plans-fail-i-just-dont-think-nzta-has-tried

  8. This “new” design (2025) has Kent/Cambridge terrace traffic go under the Arras tunnel traffic (SH1)… ie remain at the same…

  9. Hold on GreenWelly – not sure what you mean there. Can you explain please?

  10. I’m guessing future proofing for MRT that was part of the reason the N/S traffic (Cambridge Terrace-Adelaide Road) now remains…

  11. A raised pedestrian plaza over the roads and connecting the basin reserve to the central greenway of Kent/Cambridge could also…

  12. That’s what I was thinking. The core Option X concepts appear sound, and are baked into this scheme. If the…

  13. Isn’t the Basin Reseve section very, very similar to Option X? It has borrowed all the key concepts, just with…

  14. Imagine if a future government wishes to invest in a mass rapid transit service to Newtown and beyond, as agreed…

  15. I guess that one of the issues for me is that this is a scheme that has proposed answers that…

  16. I don’t understand the predilection for having everything at ground level. It simply means that there’s always someone waiting for…