The Eye of the Fish

Maximus
May 20, 2010

On the waterfront

The WCC is asking for your input into the waterfront, again. It seems like we’ve hardly stopped commenting on it, and yet, so important is this part of the city to our overall ethos, that we’re keen to look again. Incidentally – the time for submissions on the Manners Mall proposal – has passed, and I see that the Arch Centre has given it a firm thumbs down. Good on them – it was appallingly planned out – the design for the whole thing look like it had been done by a roading engineer with a fetish for parking, and that the Council’s much vaunted new urban design unit clearly had no input at all. Sadly, unless you lot all kick up a real stink, we’re going to be left with a real stinker. Much like today’s budget I fear…

But while the city wants us to look at the waterfront and comment (click right here) on the need for a giant ice-rink, or a giant tent for shopping in, or for the need for designer loos shaped like a wonky lobster, perhaps it is time to look at the what is going up there now?

How is that Whare Waka for you?

For me: it’s looking quite exciting – but also, quite big ! Crikey ! There’s a basement (for the beers / taonga?) and a whole lot of massive concrete columns and some crazy steelwork going up. I think it is going to be fabulous – just a lot bigger than I had thought from those dinky little perspectives. What do you reckon?

Of course, one day there’s going to be a fantastic collection of waka in here – we hope – presumably not the ones out of Te Papa, although it would be nice if they could see the water again, but I presume that the Te Atiawa iwi have some other waka parked up waiting? But in the mean time, its going to be another booze barn for boof heads in the Cup next year. Once that roof goes on. And it is the roofing material that worries me. What is that black stuff? Is it just a membrane? Or is it metal? Cos if it is metal, then we really could say it was a crinkly tin roof…

Will de Cleene
20 - 05 - 10

That’s one big Mother Waka (Mother Ship).

SimonBK
20 - 05 - 10

I thought it was designed by a roading engineer? or at the least will be left to the roading chaps now the WCCs urban design unit has lost any connection to design (hasnt it?)
PS, got any plans of the Whare Waka, I tried to do a search for them but to no avail?

I cant wait to see the final execution as the architecture looks promising and a good example of a mid-scale public building with a strong, singular aesthetic and nice departure from many of the buildings built along the waterfront in the last few years

It does look large compared to the renders produced – you had to look hard at the elevations to see the true scale of it but as long as things actually happen in and around it I think the Whare Waka should be a fantastic addition to the waterfront.

Seamonkey Madness
21 - 05 - 10

Don’t even get me started on this.
Size.
Placement.
The need for it at all.

*sigh*

Wet blanket
21 - 05 - 10

Size: modest and in keeping with teh adjacent buildings & spaces.

Placement: aligned with St Johns bar & Kupe statue, positioned to give some structure to the public spaces.

The need for it at all: Something that gives intamacy and definition to otherwise formless public spaces? A place to store and celebrate the ceremonial waka? The only built representation of Maori culture on the waterfront? An interesting piece of conteomporary architcture? A functions space and cafe that faces across the lagoon to the city & settng sun?

Sounds good to me.

andy foster
21 - 05 - 10

Thanks all for your comments.

Waterfront Development Plan is being consulted on (again) so soon because last year’s was only a one year plan and it was late in the year (in fact the consultation was Novemberish) so this year it’s on track timewise. There are several elements that I think are very much up for grabs, the temporary acitivities (tent and ice rink) being in that category. We don’t yet have a business plan that says ‘viable’ or ‘not viable’ yet. My suspicion is that the tent in particular will be marginal at best if it’s likely to be there for only 5 years. Alongside the wharewaka the work to complete Taranaki Wharf is also programmed. It includes extending the lagoon a bit closer to the wharewaka, so as to align with launching areas and seating. There’s also a direct wide walkway from the City to Sea Bridge running directly to/past the wharewaka (saving wet muddy feet crossing the grass !) Your collective thoughts very much appreciated.

On Manners Mall I’d also be interested in you expanding your comments. I supported it as an improvement for PT and a key part of delivering a PT spine right through the CBD. That means we need to go back and revisit the ducking by the majority of councillors of Courtenay Place bus priority a couple of years ago.

However I think, as did several of the very thoughtful submitters councillors heard today on the traffic resolutions to give effect to Manners Mall proposal that there are a whole bunch of details that need amending. Some of the more salient features I think need amending are :

1 – The proposal allows general eastbound traffic (ie exiting Boulcott St) down Manners St to Victoria St. Sure that will be somewhat better than the existing situation for motorists but mixing significant volumes of general traffic with the buses will certainly undermine the very PT efficiency the Manners Mall project aims to achieve. It would also require another light phase at Victoria St – slowing up northbound buses. We do need to provide for cars in the CBD, but increasing the volume on the Golden Mile doesn’t make sense, logically, and is not in accord with the Nguaranga to Airport Strategy.

2 – I think there are also several areas where parking has been given too high a priority at expense of public amenity. This particularly includes Dixon St east (adjacent Te Aro park) where there is obvious opportunity to make soem real improvements to the park and to the pavement on the southern side of Dixon St. Having a northerly perspective it should be made for outside seating areas for cafes etc. Another element, compatable with but not required for the above changes would be as some people have suggested, cutting Dixon St in two for vehicles – ie allowing Cuba Mall to cross Dixon St. Given that the buses come out of Dixon St there seems to me to be a lot of merit in looking at that too in terms of whether traffic circulation actually requires vehicles to go right through Dixon St

3 – The proposed changes to Taranaki – Courtenay intersection (under construction) including taking out pedestrian islands look to make pedestrian danger worse, rather than better. This is as pointed out by the AA, the worst black spot in the city.

4 – On the more posiitve side there is recognition of the opportunity to link the redeveloped Lower Cuba St across Wakefield St into Civic Square.

There are several more details I’m also interested in – so your thoughts would be very welcome. Councillors will receive a paper from officers considering the points made in submissions, and will be discussing the traffic resolutions at Strategy and Policy meeting on June 10. (meeting open to the public of course)

Warmest regards

Andy Foster
Urban Development Leader
Wellington City Council

Maximus
22 - 05 - 10

Gidday Andy, Nice to see a councillor making helpful comments here. Regarding those comments –
1 – Manners St (at present) gets choked with traffic, and it has 2 lanes flowing one way. Surely it has to be a clearly stated principle that there is no way on earth that with a bus lane of one lane each way, that you would want / allow anything other than buses only down there. That’s just such a basic simple premise, that it makes me wonder about the rest of the scheme.
2 – Absolutely, agreed.
3 – I went down to Courtenay / Taranaki at about 2am the other day, and it is mayhem, with drunken, half naked screaming from boys and girls alike. Major major issue, with or without cars. But a lethal combination with big wide intersection and several lanes of cars revving. The current scheme needs to be improved an awful lot….
4 – Sounds good.

You running for Mayor yet? You should be.