Another week, another week of chronic stupidity from the Council. It seems hard to fathom, given the amount of flack that Tory has weathered over the last couple of years, but they seem hell-bound on doing stupid things yet again, and spending money that they do not have, on things that are not necessary. Sigh…..
This time the fresh stupidity is the response to the call for fencing off the entire waterfront. Joel McManus bet me to it in terms of publication date, with an excellent piece on the Spinoff, linked here, and in it he says “There are four options on the table:
• Install full edge protection fencing and complete lighting works
• Remove temporary fencing and complete lighting works
• Retain temporary fencing and complete lighting works
• Install fencing in key locations and complete lighting works“
There are, of course, many other ways to respond to the issue, but what seems to be done here is in every case to propose some new, probably brighter lighting – and certainly more of it around the waterfront, and possibly some new fencing. I’m not sure where the new lighting is meant to go – above deck or below deck? Let’s have a look at some of the other possibilities.

First up has to be the option to leave it as it is, but to put in the equivalent of an ambulance at the bottom of the cliff – it works perfectly well for the rest of Aotearoa, so why not here. By that I mean the simple addition of a regular spacing of life belts, which are jaunty, easy to use, low cost, and could give Wellington some much needed ticks in the life-saving space. How much is a floating rubber ring? My first web-search says I can buy one for just $99 Aussie dollars – so even if one is stolen per week, the proposed $11 million would finance somewhere around 100,000 of these – that’s enough for a thousand life rings per year for a hundred years. And a thousand rings over a two kilometre waterfront would mean a spacing of one every two metres. Job done lads, its a good un.

Second possibility must surely be some more ladders. Assuming that it is only drunken pissheads that are falling in to such an extent that they cannot save themselves, positioning a ladder for them to climb back out again seems like a relatively simple solution too. I’m quite inclined to think that the effect of a splash into the water would most likely have the immediate effect of waking the falling person up quite quickly, and for them to rapidly set their sail for the nearest way out of the harbour, back onto dry land. It is pretty protected around the waterfront, and full of wildlife (other than soused teens), like birds, fishes and occasionally mammals, none of which can climb ladders. So let’s put in some more ladders – again, cheap as chips. Seriously – only $200 to $400 each. Buy 30 of the buggers, enough for one every 60m all the way along. That’s only $11 thousand, not $11 million.

Why isn’t Wellington City Council doing some basic maths like this, figuring things out themselves, instead of agreeing a sum of $11 million and only then asking what the issue is? Who the fuck is running the shop these days? Which numbskull agreed to go ahead on installing a cycleway directly above pipes that they KNEW were well past their best-by date, and highly likely to blow (as I believe they did so today). I mean seriously, where is the brain of the WCC ? My apologies for the rude language, but for God’s sake – has no one at the Council got a shred of common sense?

There are other, cheaper methods to combat the scourge of drunken revellers, although now that they have killed off Homegrown as well as the Rugby Sevens, there is going to be a lot less drunken people wandering along the waterfront. Actually – I take that back – the annual WOW fest still draws in major numbers of punters, and I’m sure they are imbibing champers by the bucketful. Generally however, the grey rinse girls are a lot less likely to get so pissed that they fall into the harbour. I think that so far, of the seven people who have (tragically) lost their lives, they are all male? Hold the line caller, I’ll go and check…
Nothing that I can find on their sex or gender, but I think it is fairly likely that they are all male. Men are generally more stupid than women and they die all the time doing stupid things. Don’t believe me? Watch Fail Army. Read a Skateboard magazine.

What other methods can we look for before spending more millions that we don’t have, on fencing that we don’t need, and that no-one except a clueless coroner asked for? Alternative solutions people – give the City your alternative solutions! Floating pontoon? Netting? Free water-wings to every punter who leaves on his own and looks unsteady on his pins? Bungy cords tied around people’s feet?
Of course, the danger is that every single thing that you do risks even more the chance that “the silly bugger” would try even harder to jump into the harbour. Put a fence up, and some fat plonker will try to vault over it. Stick barbed wire on the top and someone will get out the pliers and speed it off the scene. Any more suggestions?
Cipolla’s quadrant is a useful tool to both identify and quantify stupidity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_M._Cipolla
Fascinating, thank you Mr Henry Filth. I did not know this:
“The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity” (1976) (“Le leggi fondamentali della stupidità umana”, 1976), explores the controversial subject of stupidity.
These are Cipolla’s five fundamental laws of stupidity:
1. Always and inevitably, everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
2. The probability that a certain person (will) be stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
3. A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses.
4. Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals. In particular, non-stupid people constantly forget that at all times and places, and under any circumstances, to deal and/or associate with stupid people always turns out to be a costly mistake.
5. A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.
Corollary: a stupid person is more dangerous than a pillager.”
Another case in point – the Council has just completed, at massive expense and huge inconvenience to most of Wellington, a brand new gold-plated cycleway along the former foreshore in Thorndon. And on day one, when they opened said cycleway, this happens:
https://www.thepost.co.nz/a/nz-news/360619594/citys-newest-bike-lane-confusing-and-dangerous-some?
Yes indeed. Lack of consultation perhaps ? But cyclist refusing to use the brand new cycle lane because they find it too “confusing and dangerous” has at least one of them vowing to continue to use the road instead – that’s a major self-inflicted wound! “Catharine Underwood says she will stick to riding on the road rather than battling oncoming cyclists.” Please, no, for a start no-one spells their name that way – what are you doing? And secondly – if there is one action that is bound to piss off already-pissed-off-motorists even more than they are at present, it is to find cyclists using the road when the city has just spent $100 million or whatever on a cycleway – they will be furious.
And then there is this gold from Cycle Wellington’s “Patrick Morgan”
However he also said those using the bi-directional lane should “ride to the conditions… at a safe and courteous speed”, while others who wanted to go faster could still use the road.
Its gonna be a cluster, with “safe and courteous speeds (whatever those are) on the cycle way, while the MAMILs belting into work remain on the road….
Additionally there is no signage indicating that bikes on the cycle way should give way to those on the pedestrian crossings….
Out of idle curiosity, who or what is a MAMIL?
Middle -Aged -Male -In Lycra
Curious that there is no MAFIL… which in my mind is a much more enjoyable sight than a MAMIL….
Nemo – this post and comments are worth reading.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/CyclingActionNetwork/posts/9474632812617473/
Journalists would never cherry-pick random comments to support their article’s (and paymaster’s) viewpoint. Never!
And doesn’t sound like she follows cycle-path etiquette and is just being a massive pain in the arse to all the other users.
Also, it isn’t even finished yet.
Ride to the left, and ring your bell. Two instructions that never go out of fashion.
My question is though, and this is a big one for NZTA – are our rental Flamingo Scooters allowed in the cycle lane? Logically, they should be, yes, but legally, it is a grey area. Any idea if it has been resolved yet?
Doesn’t look like you can, no.
Seems silly tbh, as it would take away another conflict point.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/auckland-woman-suffers-injuries-after-being-run-over-by-lime-scooter-on-footpath-rider-identified-and-banned/QBMQUOE3MVFUJMK3UNZFDQSOWA/
Although I feel the laws of stupidity and Murphy will always reign over any chance for Darwin to take care of the problem quick enough.
I’ve never let someone saying No have any effect on me. It is clearly highly unsafe to ride a Flamingo down a car lane, where cars are going 30-40-50-60 km/h, and the scooter is usually doing 12-20 km/h. It is terrifying to ride a scooter down a bus lane, with the bus behind you being 30-40 tonnes in weight, and feelign frustrated that you are using their lane. And it is really not appreciated that scooters are ridden on pavements, as pedestrians hat us and feel threatened. Using cycle lanes is the only / logical place. So i do.
Oh, completely agree.
The dickhead who climbed the water whirler sculpture and broke it in the process said in court “there wasn’t a sign saying do not climb this sculpture” and the judge, in my opinion, missed the opportunity to point out that said dickhead (Hunter Macdonald) did not have a sign hanging around his neck saying “please do not punch me in the face”
https://www.1news.co.nz/2018/11/08/man-who-broke-300k-wellington-sculpture-in-viral-video-appears-in-court/
Cipolla’s rules are reflected in the famous expression – “Do not argue with idiots – they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience”
There was a job going at WCC I was thinking about applying for and this is a factor in deciding to stay private sector – these people couldn’t organise a fuck in a brothel
Was it a role as Mayor ? I hear there could be an opening there!
Also role soon coming available as PM….
Related to your Fail Army comment, have you ever seen a female version of Jackass at all? No.
I mean it seems that the waterfront attracts its fair share of idiots, case in point: the Len Lye water whirler.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/wellingtons-water-whirler-snapped-in-half-followed-by-midnight-skinny-dip/V7UNSH5DTVA7DIN6O6X6WBDMWE/
There will always be alcohol. There will always be people (*cough* men *cough*) who imbibe too much and do stupid shit (whether they are aware that they are doing it or not doesn’t matter – it still happens). And there will always (knock on wood) be a vibrant Wellington waterfront.
Fencing the whole thing off will be a pointless, expensive exercise as you have so eloquently pointed out above Nemo.
Continuing on your line of thought, another thing that the Council are considering, is to think about Demolishing the Michael Fowler Centre.
Surely this has to be amongst the ultimate in stupidity?
It is not a seismic hazard, it is not falling down, and it does not need to be demolished.
Who in Council is coming up with these absurd projects?