<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Steps Forward; One Back?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/</link>
	<description>A wide-angle view of architecture, urban design and life in Wellington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-14830</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-14830</guid>
		<description>This looks ripe picking for a Hilton Hotel now the Queens Wharf spot has been vetoed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks ripe picking for a Hilton Hotel now the Queens Wharf spot has been vetoed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 10:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-406</guid>
		<description>This looks ripe picking for a Hilton Hotel now the Queens Wharf spot has been vetoed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks ripe picking for a Hilton Hotel now the Queens Wharf spot has been vetoed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eye of the Fish &#187; Updates</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Eye of the Fish &#187; Updates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>[...] Athfield-designed Overseas Passenger terminal has just been granted resource consent, having now satisfied previously concerns related to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Athfield-designed Overseas Passenger terminal has just been granted resource consent, having now satisfied previously concerns related to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eye of the Fish &#187; Stop Transit&#8217;s Tunnels - A Summary</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Eye of the Fish &#187; Stop Transit&#8217;s Tunnels - A Summary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] new road project is the overseas passenger terminal of the 21st century - by the time it is finished it will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new road project is the overseas passenger terminal of the 21st century &#8211; by the time it is finished it will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 05:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>As far as I know there was only one Officer that was to report to the hearing. I believe other parties were consulted as to the impacts, and their findings used for the report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know there was only one Officer that was to report to the hearing. I believe other parties were consulted as to the impacts, and their findings used for the report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Wederell</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Wederell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/two-steps-forward-one-back/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Your post on Tuesday about the OPT proposal: did only one officer make an adverse rerport (as shown by the spelling), or were others party to that recommendation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post on Tuesday about the OPT proposal: did only one officer make an adverse rerport (as shown by the spelling), or were others party to that recommendation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

