<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eye of the Fish &#187; Waterfront Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eyeofthefish.org/tag/waterfront-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eyeofthefish.org</link>
	<description>A wide-angle view of architecture, urban design and life in Wellington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 22:26:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Waterfront Watch Wins Waterfront War</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/waterfront-watch-wins-waterfront-war/</link>
		<comments>http://eyeofthefish.org/waterfront-watch-wins-waterfront-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 05:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kumutoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterfront Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wellington waterfront]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/?p=3217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking News &#8211; Waterfront Watch has succeeded in the Environment Court, putting WCC and WWL well and truly back in their bottle, with the turning down of Variation 11. Congratulations to Pauline Swann and her indefatigable spirit. Other news media like Stuff and Scoop haven&#8217;t posted this story yet, so I can&#8217;t confirm, but it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eyeofthefish.org/waterfront-watch-wins-waterfront-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Variation 11</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/variation-11/</link>
		<comments>http://eyeofthefish.org/variation-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic-Places-Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queens-wharf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variation-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterfront]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterfront Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/?p=1691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wellington City Council must have known it was going to be picking a hard road to go down when it proposed Variation 11, and sure enough, the District Plan change is due to go to appeal at the Environment Court. Most of our readers will know about it: it&#8217;s a variation to permit buildings [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eyeofthefish.org/variation-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

