<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strengthening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eyeofthefish.org/strengthening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/strengthening/</link>
	<description>A wide-angle view of architecture, urban design and life in Wellington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximus</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/strengthening/#comment-14875</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/?p=1297#comment-14875</guid>
		<description>Curiously little comment from anyone on this topic, except for you Alan. &lt;br&gt;This policy is probably going to have the most effect on wellingtonians, and the appearance of their city - but nothing yet? &lt;br&gt;Ah well, i&#039;m sure the howls of outrage will start once the bulldozers move in....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curiously little comment from anyone on this topic, except for you Alan. <br />This policy is probably going to have the most effect on wellingtonians, and the appearance of their city &#8211; but nothing yet? <br />Ah well, i&#39;m sure the howls of outrage will start once the bulldozers move in&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximus</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/strengthening/#comment-13312</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/?p=1297#comment-13312</guid>
		<description>Curiously little comment from anyone on this topic, except for you Alan. 
This policy is probably going to have the most effect on wellingtonians, and the appearance of their city - but nothing yet? 
Ah well, i&#039;m sure the howls of outrage will start once the bulldozers move in....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curiously little comment from anyone on this topic, except for you Alan.<br />
This policy is probably going to have the most effect on wellingtonians, and the appearance of their city &#8211; but nothing yet?<br />
Ah well, i&#8217;m sure the howls of outrage will start once the bulldozers move in&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/strengthening/#comment-13001</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/?p=1297#comment-13001</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be interested in this recent report from the Dominion:<br />
<a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/3000700/42m-to-prepare-for-the-big-one" rel="nofollow">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/3000700/42m-to-prepare-for-the-big-one</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The city council is working its way through a list of about 3800 properties identified as being potentially unstable in a moderate earthquake. So far, 136 properties, including 21 heritage buildings, have been confirmed as vulnerable, while about 1000 others have been given the all-clear&#8230;.   &#8230;.The new list reflects the more stringent standards introduced with the 2004 Building Act, which says a building has to meet 33 per cent of the current seismic loading standard for a new building.</p>
<p>&#8220;The council began work to identify earthquake-vulnerable buildings in mid-2006, but stopped issuing notices while it reviewed its buildings policy in the past financial year, council building compliance manager Steve Cody said. Work had since restarted, but there was a backlog of notices to be issued. It would take about three more years to get through all 3800 properties, he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;The policy was completed in July. The main change was a longer time frame for improvement works to be done – extended from between five and 15 years to 10-20 years. This reflected the complexity and cost of strengthening work, Mr Cody said. It was also fairer to building owners in the midst of a recession. &#8220;It&#8217;s no use making it difficult for them to achieve what you want them to achieve.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

