<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ephemera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/</link>
	<description>A wide-angle view of architecture, urban design and life in Wellington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:44:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: artvanderlay</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5643</link>
		<dc:creator>artvanderlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5643</guid>
		<description>The Aussie postcode is really State + Postcode. There are postcodes that span states (0872 spans 3: NT, SA and WA). All we need to do is to get NZ added as a state and it will work fine.

By the way, it would be nice if we could adopt the Aussie practise of using just Suburb + Postcode. The Post Office knows Khandallah is Wellington - why should I have to write Wellington if I write a postcode. There are surprisingly few duplicate suburb names, in fact I can&#039;t think of any off the top of my head.

And is &quot;postcode&quot; or &quot;post code&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Aussie postcode is really State + Postcode. There are postcodes that span states (0872 spans 3: NT, SA and WA). All we need to do is to get NZ added as a state and it will work fine.</p>
<p>By the way, it would be nice if we could adopt the Aussie practise of using just Suburb + Postcode. The Post Office knows Khandallah is Wellington &#8211; why should I have to write Wellington if I write a postcode. There are surprisingly few duplicate suburb names, in fact I can&#8217;t think of any off the top of my head.</p>
<p>And is &#8220;postcode&#8221; or &#8220;post code&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5525</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5525</guid>
		<description>My pet gripe is that NZ Post has used the same format as Australia&#039;s postcodes. And Australia takes its postcodes much more seriously. 

This has already caused me grief with Australian-based banks and retailers; I now live in fear that all my online shopping will be delivered to &quot;Balcatta and Stirling&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pet gripe is that NZ Post has used the same format as Australia&#8217;s postcodes. And Australia takes its postcodes much more seriously. </p>
<p>This has already caused me grief with Australian-based banks and retailers; I now live in fear that all my online shopping will be delivered to &#8220;Balcatta and Stirling&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobsta</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5411</link>
		<dc:creator>mobsta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5411</guid>
		<description>American Air craft carriers have there own zip codes apparently.
Which is pretty cool.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American Air craft carriers have there own zip codes apparently.<br />
Which is pretty cool&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M-D</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5410</link>
		<dc:creator>M-D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5410</guid>
		<description>6022 for Lyall Bay - I&#039;m officially an outsider to this particular online community...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6022 for Lyall Bay &#8211; I&#8217;m officially an outsider to this particular online community&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erentz</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5401</link>
		<dc:creator>erentz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5401</guid>
		<description>10,000 post codes, heck even 1,000 post codes seems like enough in this country if you ask me. Giving you say a post code per about 1,000 homes, or maybe about 30 streets.

It doesn&#039;t need to pinpoint an exact house, just needs to remove any ambiguity about the address, and ideally narrow down the number of possible streets to such a level that a machine can easily identify attrociously written addresses within that post code (set of ~30 street names). Which would make electronic sorting a whole lot easier and less error prone for a machine to do.

I agree though, it seems strange that with so many possible post codes they all end up so large. :-\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10,000 post codes, heck even 1,000 post codes seems like enough in this country if you ask me. Giving you say a post code per about 1,000 homes, or maybe about 30 streets.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t need to pinpoint an exact house, just needs to remove any ambiguity about the address, and ideally narrow down the number of possible streets to such a level that a machine can easily identify attrociously written addresses within that post code (set of ~30 street names). Which would make electronic sorting a whole lot easier and less error prone for a machine to do.</p>
<p>I agree though, it seems strange that with so many possible post codes they all end up so large. :-\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starkive</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5385</link>
		<dc:creator>starkive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5385</guid>
		<description>Newbs -  so it&#039;s you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newbs &#8211;  so it&#8217;s you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newbs</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5382</link>
		<dc:creator>Newbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5382</guid>
		<description>i can never remember my postcode so i just make a number up when i&#039;m asked for it. The mail always gets through regardless, so i have faith in the old system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can never remember my postcode so i just make a number up when i&#8217;m asked for it. The mail always gets through regardless, so i have faith in the old system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidp</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5381</link>
		<dc:creator>davidp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5381</guid>
		<description>&gt;apparently there is such a thing called Godwin’s Law 

I think Godwin&#039;s only applies to comparing another person, such as a commenter or blog writer, to something Germanic from the 1930s or 40s. Not to noting that post codes were probably invented by the extremely-efficient Albert Speer in order to free up German postal workers so that they could participate in Operation Barbarossa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;apparently there is such a thing called Godwin’s Law </p>
<p>I think Godwin&#8217;s only applies to comparing another person, such as a commenter or blog writer, to something Germanic from the 1930s or 40s. Not to noting that post codes were probably invented by the extremely-efficient Albert Speer in order to free up German postal workers so that they could participate in Operation Barbarossa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximus</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5379</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5379</guid>
		<description>David P - i&#039;m soooo disappointed that you mentioned the N word. I&#039;ve been chastised before for doing that - and i was so careful not to mention N while mentioning Germany...  apparently there is such a thing called Godwin&#039;s Law where as soon as anyone mentions the word &quot;NAZI&quot; then discussion has officially gone too far, and its all beyond the pale or something like that. 

So lets just pretend that you and I never mentioned N.... and that instead it was just a super-efficient german with a lovely family frolicking in an alpine meadow, who later went on to invent BMW&#039;s or something.....

But you are, of course, absolutely right. No doubt Mr H.... had a tanty while bemoaning the lack of foresight in producing a 4-numeral system, when obviously a 7-alphanumeric system would have won the war sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David P &#8211; i&#8217;m soooo disappointed that you mentioned the N word. I&#8217;ve been chastised before for doing that &#8211; and i was so careful not to mention N while mentioning Germany&#8230;  apparently there is such a thing called Godwin&#8217;s Law where as soon as anyone mentions the word &#8220;NAZI&#8221; then discussion has officially gone too far, and its all beyond the pale or something like that. </p>
<p>So lets just pretend that you and I never mentioned N&#8230;. and that instead it was just a super-efficient german with a lovely family frolicking in an alpine meadow, who later went on to invent BMW&#8217;s or something&#8230;..</p>
<p>But you are, of course, absolutely right. No doubt Mr H&#8230;. had a tanty while bemoaning the lack of foresight in producing a 4-numeral system, when obviously a 7-alphanumeric system would have won the war sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximus</title>
		<link>http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5377</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeofthefish.org/ephemera/#comment-5377</guid>
		<description>by &quot;machine readable format&quot; presumably means just typing the 4 numbers of the postcode on the letter? or is there some greater dastardly super secret mind plan that we don&#039;t know about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by &#8220;machine readable format&#8221; presumably means just typing the 4 numbers of the postcode on the letter? or is there some greater dastardly super secret mind plan that we don&#8217;t know about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
